Introduction: This article as the first clinical prospective study was conducted to use of Tc-IgG as compared with autologous Tc-RBC in gated blood pool ventriculography. Moreover, two objectives were followed: (a) assess the feasibility of this radiotracer in routine practice; (b) appraise its in vivo steadiness over time by measurement of organs activity ratios and the image quality.Methods: the study population included 12 patients who referred for evaluation of liver hemangioma or infection process. Six patients underwent gated planar blood pool (GPBP) acquisition using Tc-RBC and remaining 6 cases underwent GPBP with Tc-IgG. Additionally, to evaluate the activity ratios in different organs, ROIs were manually drawn over the LV, RV, right lung, left lung, aorta, liver and spleen on the static anterior datasets in 20 minute (early) and also delayed (180 minutes) post injection of Tc-RBC and Tc-IgG.Ratios of activity between the early and delayed images were compared for each ROI.Results: The mean time of acquisition following injection of each radiotracer (RBC; 75.83±11.75 minute Vs IgG; 80.00±7.09 minute) was not different [p value>0.05]. Observer 1 and 2 were classified good quality for both radiotracers in all participants. The mean ejection fraction (EF) of patients with Tc-RBC and Tc-IgG wan not significantly different (59.00±7.64 % vs.58.33±16.03 %) [P value>0.05]. The ratio of LV to crescent background in GBP was not statistically difference between two agents (RBC; 2.55±0.99 Vs IgG; 2.11±0.78) The mean activity of LV and RV to backgrounds ratios in patients with Tc-IgG was more (although nonsignificant) relative to cases radiolabeled with in vitro Tc-RBC on early and delayed views (P>0.05). In addition, the relevant constancy of biodistribution of both radiotracers over time was also compared in the organs activities between the early and delayed studies.Conclusion: This data showed that the use of Tc-IgG in cardiac blood pool studies might led to comparable images as Tc-RBC. Therefore, 99mTc-IgG, readily accessible and needing a single injection, might be an attractive alternative to Tc-RBC for the estimation of LV function, especially in subjects with poor vein quality or busy departments.